Topic: "not rich" | |
---|---|
McCain Campaign Agrees With CNBC Pundit: Americans Making $200,000 Are ‘Not Rich’»
mccainbowtie3.jpgWriting in Avenue, “a glossy, lifestyle magazine that chronicles the lives of Manhattan’s affluent and socially powerful,” CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo warns readers that under Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), “the income tax is…in for a bump”: Right now [it] is 35 percent, Obama wants to take that to 39 percent…We’re talking about people who make over $200,000. That’s not rich. So it’s actually going to impact more people than you may think. $200,000 may not look like much from Bartiromo’s perch, where she is making a seven-figure salary and just received a whopping $500,000 for her book advance. Michael Goldfarb, the newest member of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) communications team, highlighted Bartiromo’s statements in the “Morning Update” on the official campaign blog, The McCain Report. The McCain campaign’s perception of American incomes is woefully out of touch. An income of $200,000 places an American family firmly in the “rich” category: – The 2006 census showed that an income of $174,012 put an American household within the top 5 percent of income earners. – A report by the Citizens for Tax Justice estimates that in 2008, “only 3.2 percent of taxpayers will have adjusted gross income (AGI) greater than $200,000 and only 2.1 percent will have AGI over $250,000.” – A 2007 Wall Street Journal article placed earners who make $277,000 in the top 1 percent of all income earners. McCain’s fundamental misunderstanding of American incomes leads to his disastrous policies. His so-called “middle class tax relief” plan gives only 9 percent of its benefits to the bottom 80 percent of taxpayers, doling out 58 percent of the benefits to the top 1 percent. McCain, of course, ranks as the eighth wealthiest U.S. senator, with an average net worth of $36.4 million. |
|
|
|
I'm confused. I saw Obama speak last week. He said that the tax increase would be for people that made over $250,000 and only the amount over that $250,000. He also said it was 30%.
He also said that on the debates and to Joe. |
|
|
|
I'm confused. I saw Obama speak last week. He said that the tax increase would be for people that made over $250,000 and only the amount over that $250,000. He also said it was 30%. He also said that on the debates and to Joe. Obama and McCain have both changed platforms since the election. Congress writes the tax code, so what does it matter what the candidates think? They are both out of touch with reality. |
|
|
|
I have no idea why they used that figure instead of $250,000.00
|
|
|
|
I'm confused. I saw Obama speak last week. He said that the tax increase would be for people that made over $250,000 and only the amount over that $250,000. He also said it was 30%. He also said that on the debates and to Joe. Obama and McCain have both changed platforms since the election. Congress writes the tax code, so what does it matter what the candidates think? They are both out of touch with reality. I saw Obama say it last week. |
|
|