2 Next
Topic: I have a question
no photo
Wed 08/20/08 08:06 PM




Yes, if I applied faulty logic and false definitions, I would come to the same conclusion as you. But since I use the correct definitions and proper logic, I have come to a different conclusion.

flowerforyou


You're doing just find Spider. Just keep moving forward a little bit at time. You've already discovered that God can't be omnipotent, that's a good start. bigsmile


By your silly definition, God couldn't be omnipotent. By your definitions, your god couldn't exist at all. But Christians and Jews have a God who does exist and isn't made up with a foundation of shifting sand.




Dont forget the Muslims - they have a god that exists too.

oh, and the Shintoists

and the Buddhists

and not forgetting Zoroastrians believe in one God too ...




Nope, just the Christians and Jews.

hinkypoepoe's photo
Wed 08/20/08 11:26 PM
Ok...I thought this threads topic was ment to be kept light hearted.


WHY SO SER-EEE-USSSS?!

Krimsa's photo
Thu 08/21/08 04:27 AM



Yes, if I applied faulty logic and false definitions, I would come to the same conclusion as you. But since I use the correct definitions and proper logic, I have come to a different conclusion.

flowerforyou


You're doing just find Spider. Just keep moving forward a little bit at time. You've already discovered that God can't be omnipotent, that's a good start. bigsmile


By your silly definition, God couldn't be omnipotent. By your definitions, your god couldn't exist at all. But Christians and Jews have a God who does exist and isn't made up with a foundation of shifting sand.




No, he's just an ambiguous invisible man up in the clouds somewhere. Besides you do realize that there is substantial evidence to support the fact that the religion of the ancient Hebrews had elements of polytheism.

hinkypoepoe's photo
Thu 08/21/08 11:29 PM
Hey, did a priest get freaky with you or what???
yes i am in a moooddd tonight!


Belushi's photo
Fri 08/22/08 02:05 AM





Yes, if I applied faulty logic and false definitions, I would come to the same conclusion as you. But since I use the correct definitions and proper logic, I have come to a different conclusion.

flowerforyou


You're doing just find Spider. Just keep moving forward a little bit at time. You've already discovered that God can't be omnipotent, that's a good start. bigsmile


By your silly definition, God couldn't be omnipotent. By your definitions, your god couldn't exist at all. But Christians and Jews have a God who does exist and isn't made up with a foundation of shifting sand.




Dont forget the Muslims - they have a god that exists too.

oh, and the Shintoists

and the Buddhists

and not forgetting Zoroastrians believe in one God too ...




Nope, just the Christians and Jews.


Why just them?

Thats not nice.

After all, Some of those religions are older than christianity.

... and if you are prepared to accept that christianity and judaism are allowed to have god, then you HAVE to accept the existance of islam as he is the little brother of christianity, or the son of judaism.

no photo
Fri 08/22/08 06:13 AM

Why just them?

Thats not nice.

After all, Some of those religions are older than christianity.

... and if you are prepared to accept that christianity and judaism are allowed to have god, then you HAVE to accept the existance of islam as he is the little brother of christianity, or the son of judaism.


No, I don't. According to Islam, the Jews tricked Allah. The God of Abraham knows everything and cannot be tricked, therefore Allah is not the God of Abraham.

2 Next