Topic: Bills therom | |
---|---|
hey glenn go ahead turn it to fox news you need to hear other ringwing
people dont you. |
|
|
|
illegal war? for the rich? if thats all the rehtoric you got, your
arguments pretty weak. 1. TELL ME HOW MANY PEOPLE SUPPORTED THE WAR before it started. we gave Saddam chances and warning for years before we went there. We knew he killed thousands of his own people with WMD. wE KNeW ABOUT THE TORTURE CHAMBERS AND the rapes and the 200 palaces built while his people starved. It was probably the most "legal" war in history from the outset. Get over it. 2. For the rich? Do you A- work for yourselves? or B- WORK FOR A COMPANY. WONT GET INTO C- collect welfare The republicans give tax breaks to the wealthy to free up monies in the economy. this equals what, class? more JOBS FOR U AND ME. tHE RECENT DEMOCRATS/ LIBERALS/ COMMIES... ARE tax and spend. social programs. social= socialism? theres a clue. anyway when in office, the last liberal crew is the one that raised our taxes while shipping our jobs overseas. Problem. When we manufacture stuff overseas, who does the labor? dont know but its not American citizens. ifno one has a good paying job, who is going to buy the widgets? the economy goes into depression,,, as it is now. besides is it illegal to make more money than you make comerade? |
|
|
|
....no comment from the commies?
|
|
|
|
you got something agiaist commies. i moved hear when i was ten guess
your brainwashing did not work on me. not even i basic training. by the way in gulf war. i dont recall you being by my side could i be mistaking. |
|
|
|
Gary I think you have about ridden the "I don't recall you by my side in
the war" pony to death. You seem to fall back on that argumement whenever challenged on an issue. About all I can say is do you want some cheese to go with that whine? You lament about the Republicans being only for the rich, I am not rich but I am a Republican. It might interest you to know that the richest 1% of the people in the U.S. pay 37% of the total income tax. The richest 5% of the people in the U.S. pay a total of 52% of the income tax. If you do away with those rich people where are you going to get the money to pay for the socaial programs that liberals are so fond of? Guess who started taxing social security and other retirement pay that had already been taxed once when it was earned. Here's a clue, it wasn't a Republican it was Bill Clinton. Who does that tax hurt the most, the people that can least afford it, the people on fixed incomes. |
|
|
|
sounds like same old line . when u repubicans dont have and answer. you
go back to clinton. very lame, i,m sure you got your facts from fox news.as far as me not being in war with you i was only 9 or 10 years old at time. but unlike you i new when to put my gun down . in 1991 we had lots of chances to take over iraq. but are lovely congress men pasted on the chance.now 3000 of my follow soilders have to give there life or worse in up in walter reeds great rooms with rats.just shows government dont care boy now that respect right. |
|
|
|
I agree with rambills first post, Communism moved here, if has two
names; Bush, and Newguy!!! LMAO Im impressed with gardenforge, I dont agree with him, but at least he shows signs that maybe there are other ways to solve a problem than his own. He listened and even complimented a few other peoples suggestions. You go gardenforge. From an American (independent) Otherwise known as Fanta46 |
|
|
|
Thats Independent, in Spirit, heart, and mind!
No sheep here..... |
|
|
|
as a young child i came to usa. but that being said i can complain all i
want. still best place in the world. |
|
|
|
That aint good enough though. To just be the best, with all this
potential, and then just quit because we are the best. Come on, we are Americans!!! |
|
|
|
yes we are i dont agree with alot here but when i vist my family and see
one tv in there house then i think i have one in every room.things could be better hear. but we cant all agree. boths side have there points i will admitt i voted for reagan twice . but vote for clinton to. |
|
|
|
Gary, What Country are you from?
|
|
|
|
well i,m from hungary but been here since i was ten years old.
|
|
|
|
Gary, wasent there in desert dust take 1, but spent 6 yrs in the Corps
as a sniper. Was attached to nuclear stockpile security. Thank you for your service I will always respect our veterans. The only one who ever shot me was the medics. LOL |
|
|
|
rsaylors teaching of christ so you don't believe in wars and yet, you
are contradictory towards both the democratic and republican views. For a man who doesn't believe in wars you sure talk a hell about it. If the teaching of christ was about peace then you are saying that religion has no reason to be in the military faith. Let's see how many wars were conducted in the name of GOD or of Christ our Saviour. I give you one of the bloodiest event. The Holy Crusades "The Dark Ages" anyone who didn't conform to the religious teaching of Christianity were considered outcast and thus either rotted in prison or were killed. This is what they called the spread and conquest in the name of western civilization and teachings without freedom of choice. Throughout history we have had good and bad presidents but, the reality of the matter whether good or bad ... Democratic or Republican they all had a choice to make what was wrong right but, in the end no matter how many presidents come into office they still follow that same pattern of destruction... As that old saying goes: " History has a tendency to repeat itself". Gary I know where you are coming from I actually served in the Hungarian war during the time of Occupation of Germany when it was called Austro-Hungary I have family in Budapest. I have served in a lot of wars and have be privi to many secret mission so don't take me lightly about saying i have no idea or truth or even to say to the point don't believe what you read on the internet.... Fact: 9/10 The Priemer was in town and the musaad were with him. They went to compusa on 37th and 5th ave too do a little shopping and of course being a liason i heard them ask where are we going next and he told them the WTC so what would that tell you and the next day the majority of the people who died in 9/11 of the WTC were mostly black,asians,india, or pakistani or arabs,There was the school of children. Here's the question why not warn everyone and not just your people of a inpending attack.. |
|
|
|
Ah yes, Bill is from Hungary, Gina is from hungary. I wonder if one
were to trace the address of both their computers if one would find them in the same room. |
|
|
|
GARDEN, ACTUALLY THE CRUSADES WERE BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE cATHOLIC CHUCH,
not christians. Please dont confuse catholic dogma with christian beliefs or bible facts. They are often in conflict. |
|
|
|
Legislatures Look at Employer Sanctions
Published: 3/21/07, 1:46 PM EDT By JACQUES BILLEAUD More of what your federal government, isnt doing. PHOENIX (AP) - Frustrated by what they see as a lack of aggressiveness on the federal government's part, lawmakers in several states want to start doing something that has long been Washington's job: cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants. Legislators in at least nine states - Arizona, Missouri, Montana, Virginia, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas, Mississippi and Oklahoma - have considered various ideas, including fining businesses and suspending their licenses, prohibiting violators from obtaining state contracts, and requiring employers to sign affidavits saying they do not knowingly hire illegal immigrants. A few states passed laws in 2006 to confront the problem as well. A 20-year-old federal law prohibits businesses from knowingly employing illegal immigrants. And the federal government has launched several employer crackdowns over the past year. But some state legislators say Washington is not doing enough. "The feds are so woefully behind," said Republican state Sen. Chris Koster of Missouri, sponsor of a proposal that would require many employers to electronically verify the eligibility of their workers. "To sit around and wait for federal action on this is like waiting for Santa Claus." Opponents of illegal immigration complain that businesses' use of illicit labor is encouraging people to sneak across the border. Critics of some of these proposals say that states are ill-equipped to enforce immigration laws and are intruding on the federal government's constitutional powers. Nevertheless, a bill in Missouri would set fines of $10,000 to $200,000 for three-time violators, while the proposed penalties in Montana would be $300 for each illegal hiring. The West Virginia Legislature passed a bill to suspend or revoke the business licenses of employers with three violations. It is awaiting the governor's signature. Proposals in South Carolina and Kansas would require companies seeking state contracts to verify the eligibility of workers and would prohibit the awarding of state contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants. Republican state Rep. Mike Pitts of South Carolina said his bill was prompted partly by an influx of illegal immigrants into his district who are seeking jobs in agriculture, construction and the service industry. The immigrants are bringing their families and putting a strain on schools and hospitals, he said. "The flow would stop, and it would reverse the trend," Pitts said. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency responsible for investigating illegal hirings, has stepped up its enforcement of the employer sanctions law in the past year, leading to a dozen major busts. Federal officials said they are taking a new approach: focusing on criminal cases against company officials, rather than seeking just civil penalties, which were viewed by some violators as the cost of doing business. A first offense, for instance, carries civil fines from $275 to $2,200 for each illegal immigrant hired. The criminal penalties are fines as high as $3,000 and up to six months in prison for each illegal hiring. "We are getting good at focusing on areas where our attention will get the most impact," said agency spokeswoman Pat Reilly. Earlier this month, the head of a temporary labor business that used hundreds of illegal immigrants was sentenced in Ohio to 15 months in prison and ordered to forfeit $12 million. In November, a man was sentenced to 1 1/2 years in prison and ordered to forfeit $1.5 million. Authorities said he operated a contracting business in Indiana that used mostly illegal immigrants to perform stucco work. In worksite raids from October 2005 to December 2006, ICE said it made more than 1,100 criminal arrests, including those of business operators and the manufacturers of fake work documents. More than 5,200 illegal immigrants also were picked up. Reilly said the agency will take all the assistance it can get from state and local authorities. "We are an effective agency, but the problem is large," he said. However, critics say that states should not be creating a patchwork of rules and that the problem should remain the federal government's responsibility. "The state of Arizona is not equipped to address a problem that's a national problem," said Jessica Pacheco, a lobbyist for the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which opposes state legislation that would fine employers. Moreover, state penalties against employers could impinge on the federal government's authority to regulate immigration, said Tyler Moran, a policy analyst for the National Immigration Law Center, which aims to protect poor immigrants. Moran said that states and communities can suspend or revoke the business licenses of employers after they are punished by the federal government, but have no legal authority to impose further sanctions. "The states are certainly getting more creative, but they are really trying to do the same thing, which is to regulate immigration, and that's not under their power," Moran said. ___ On the Net: Arizona Legislature: http://www.azleg.gov |
|
|
|
rambill was your last comment addressed to me? I don't recall
mentioning anything about the cursades in particular or religions in general in this thread. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else. |
|
|
|
You are so correct Ram... Catholism definitely doe sNOT follow Christs
words and beliefs. |
|
|