100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Is Obama Legally Eligible to Serve as President? | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 08/21/08 11:30 AM
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION 
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. False goods? Is that what quality of life issues are now? Have you lost your mind? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. False goods? Is that what quality of life issues are now? Have you lost your mind? you missed his point....wow! what a big surprise there, huh? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Lindyy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Lindyy
on
Thu 08/21/08 04:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. False goods? Is that what quality of life issues are now? Have you lost your mind? you missed his point....wow! what a big surprise there, huh?
No, she got it right...... Lindyy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
kerbear73
on
Thu 08/21/08 05:55 PM
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. False goods? Is that what quality of life issues are now? Have you lost your mind? you missed his point....wow! what a big surprise there, huh?
As for you, you are in Argentina, so why not go find a argentina thread about the BRITISH FALKLAND Islands, I hear it is nice there and higher class since the British took it back. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 08/21/08 07:44 PM
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently! As for the lady from Argentina, if you hadn't been so rude to her, she could have been of great help to you. Ahe is one great model when it comes to thonking clearly, and expressing her thoughts coherently. Maybe if you apologize, she might reconsider and help you out. She is very generous, and always seeking to lend a hand to people in need. Hope that helps!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OH BROTHER...............VOILEAZUR
LINDYY 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii If you don't understand the difference between US territory and A US territory, again ask a friend to explain it to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently! As for the lady from Argentina, if you hadn't been so rude to her, she could have been of great help to you. Ahe is one great model when it comes to thonking clearly, and expressing her thoughts coherently. Maybe if you apologize, she might reconsider and help you out. She is very generous, and always seeking to lend a hand to people in need. Hope that helps!!! That is funny, how do I need Argentinas womans help, I have to know..... Or do you know? You didn't know that Hawaii was a State in 59, you thought it was a territory. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is a JOKE. Obama is eligible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Territory of the United States
The United States territory includes any points of extended spatial location under the control of the United States federal government. Various regions, districts, and divisions are under the supervision of the United States federal government. The United States territory includes clearly defined geographical area and refers to an area of land, air or sea under jurisdiction of United States federal governmental authority (but is not limited only to these areas). The extent of territory is all the area belonging to, and under the dominion of, the United States of America federal government (which includes tracts lying at a distance from the country) for administrative and other purposes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Territory A U.S. state is any one of the fifty subnational entities of the United States of America that share sovereignty with the federal government (four states use the official title of commonwealth rather than state). Because of this shared sovereignty, an American is a citizen both of the federal entity and of his or her state of domicile.[1] However, state citizenship is very flexible, and no government approval is required to move between states (with the exception of convicts on parole). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no wonder why voileazur didn't know, you are from CANADA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii If you don't understand the difference between US territory and A US territory, again ask a friend to explain it to you. Why don't you ask one of your Fellow Canadians if they know the "difference between US territory and A US territory " LMAO 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
voileazur
on
Thu 08/21/08 08:54 PM
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii If you don't understand the difference between US territory and A US territory, again ask a friend to explain it to you. Why don't you ask one of your Fellow Canadians if they know the "difference between US territory and A US territory " LMAO
This from your 'Homeland Security' department website. http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/crossingborders/ *************************************************************** Traveling to and from U.S. Territories U.S. Citizens traveling to and returning directly from ... ' a U.S. territory' are not considered to have left ... 'the U.S. territory' and do not need to present a passport. *************************************************************** 'A' US territory, and 'US territory' in the same sentence. If all you want to do is pick a sandbox fight, be my guest, and 'go teach' the 'HOMELAND SECURITY' officials a lesson. Obviously, according to your 'unique' perspective, they have it wrong also!!! ... or again, ask your friends to help you with reading and interpreting! Whichever course of action you choose, give the baseless and bigotted insults a break. Your neck color is starting to show!!! As for the topic of this thread, I am happy to declare that 'kerbear73', although completely off topic with the intent of his post, concurs fully with the fact that... ... Obama was born on US territory, or US soil, as to not upset the man!!! Is a full fledged american citizen from birth, ... which makes the baseless and desperate question of this thead null and void, or as some would more accurately describe it: ... pure unadulterated brainless, heartless, and soul less calumnies. The real sad part, is that calumnies, lies and mischaracterizations seem to parade as 'the truth' to too many US voters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii If you don't understand the difference between US territory and A US territory, again ask a friend to explain it to you. Why don't you ask one of your Fellow Canadians if they know the "difference between US territory and A US territory " LMAO
This from your 'Homeland Security' department website. http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/crossingborders/ *************************************************************** Traveling to and from U.S. Territories U.S. Citizens traveling to and returning directly from ... ' a U.S. territory' are not considered to have left ... 'the U.S. territory' and do not need to present a passport. *************************************************************** 'A' US territory, and 'US territory' in the same sentence. If all you wnat to do is pick a sandbxx fight, be my guest, and 'go teach' the 'HOMELAND SECURITY' officials a lesson. Obviously, according to your 'unique' perspective, they have it wrong also!!! ... or again, ask your friends to help you with reading and interpreting! Whichever course of action you choose, give the baseless and bigotted insults a break. Your neck color is starting to show!!! well that is all nice and dandy, but hawaii is a US State. Don't explain my country to me Canada boy, I don't even know why this link concerns you, You cannot even Vote for Obama or McCain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE QUESTION IS - IS OBAMA INTELLECTUALLY AND MORALLY ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT. HIS STAND ON GIVING AN ABORTED CHILD WHO SURVIVED THE ABORTION THE RIGHT TO HUMAN LIFE PROTECTION IS THE MOST HEINOUS ATTITUDE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN A HUMAN BEING, EVEN THE MOST LEFT WING LIBERALS AGREE THAT A CHILD SURVIVING AN ABORTION HAS HUMAN RIGHTS....... LINDYY AGAIN, TAKING A STAND FOR THE UNBORN CHILD AND NOW THE ONES WHO SURVIVE ABORTION
You might want to start another thread with that question Lindyy, BUT IT DEFINITELY ISN'T THE QUESTION BEING POSED BY THIS THREAD. With respect to this topic, and the 'bogus' question raised about Barack's eligibility to the office of President of the USA, it is just that: BOGUS!!! It is people's fundamentl right to prefer one candidate over another. We need only say we prefer Obama over McCain, or vice versa. NO need to keep resorting to mischaracterizations, calumnies, lies and bigotry. All current facts point to Obama being born in 1961 on US soil (Hawaï), two years after Hawaï became US territory (1959). That makes anyone, regardless of the origins of the parents, a US BORN CITIZEN. END OF SUBJECT. Distorting and mischaracterizing laws and other facts, won't change much, other than misleading and deceiving people whom would buy the false goods. Get to know you facts, Hawaii became a State in 1959... Typical Liberal My facts are known, and written correctly! Maybe you should read slower, or ask someone to read and interpret for you!!! But in any case you should give up the unfounded and out of place personal insults. They truly make you look, ... how should I say, ... silly!!! Next time you want to help 'your camp', read slowly, understand what you just read, think about what you want to say , and then write it coherently You said it was a territory, that is Different than a state, Guam is a Territory, US Virgin Islands are a territory, Hawaii was a territory and it became the 50th State in 1959. "The state was admitted to the Union on August 21, 1959, making it the 50th state. Its capital is Honolulu on the island of Oahu. The most recent census puts the state's population at 1,211,537." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii If you don't understand the difference between US territory and A US territory, again ask a friend to explain it to you. Why don't you ask one of your Fellow Canadians if they know the "difference between US territory and A US territory " LMAO
This from your 'Homeland Security' department website. http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/crossingborders/ *************************************************************** Traveling to and from U.S. Territories U.S. Citizens traveling to and returning directly from ... ' a U.S. territory' are not considered to have left ... 'the U.S. territory' and do not need to present a passport. *************************************************************** 'A' US territory, and 'US territory' in the same sentence. If all you wnat to do is pick a sandbxx fight, be my guest, and 'go teach' the 'HOMELAND SECURITY' officials a lesson. Obviously, according to your 'unique' perspective, they have it wrong also!!! ... or again, ask your friends to help you with reading and interpreting! Whichever course of action you choose, give the baseless and bigotted insults a break. Your neck color is starting to show!!! well that is all nice and dandy, but hawaii is a US State. Don't explain my country to me Canada boy, I don't even know why this link concerns you, You cannot even Vote for Obama or McCain
|
|
|
|
|
