Topic: as she says ... "We are not separate"
Belushi's photo
Sat 08/02/08 09:52 PM
Edited by Belushi on Sat 08/02/08 09:54 PM
From the BBC
A US study of text messages suggests the theory that we are all linked six steps to anyone else may be right - though seven seems more accurate.

Microsoft researchers studied the addresses of 30bn text messages sent during a single month in 2006.

Any two people on average are linked by seven or fewer acquaintances, they say.

The theory of six degrees of separation has long captured people's imagination - notably inspiring a popular 1993 film - but had recently seemed discredited.

One of the researchers on the Microsoft Messenger project, Eric Horvitz, said he had been shocked by the results.

"What we're seeing suggests there may be a social connectivity constant for humanity," he was quoted as saying by the Washington Post newspaper.

"People have had this suspicion that we are really close. But we are showing on a very large scale that this idea goes beyond folklore."

Urban myth?

The database used by Mr Horvitz and his colleague Jure Leskovec covered all of the Microsoft Messenger instant-messaging network, or roughly half of the world's instant-messaging traffic, in June 2006.

For the purposes of the study, two people were considered to be acquaintances if they had sent one another a text message.

Examining the minimum chain lengths it would take to connect all the users in the database, they found the average length was 6.6 steps and that 78% of the pairs could be connected in seven links or fewer.

The idea of six degrees of separation was conceived by US academic Stanley Milgram, after experiments in which he asked people to pass a letter only to others they knew by name.



... or it could be a "Deliverance" moment with the rednecks ..

Mah sistah is mah aunt's uncle's brutha's father's mutha

star_tin_gover's photo
Sun 08/03/08 10:06 AM

From the BBC
A US study of text messages suggests the theory that we are all linked six steps to anyone else may be right - though seven seems more accurate.

Microsoft researchers studied the addresses of 30bn text messages sent during a single month in 2006.

Any two people on average are linked by seven or fewer acquaintances, they say.

The theory of six degrees of separation has long captured people's imagination - notably inspiring a popular 1993 film - but had recently seemed discredited.

One of the researchers on the Microsoft Messenger project, Eric Horvitz, said he had been shocked by the results.

"What we're seeing suggests there may be a social connectivity constant for humanity," he was quoted as saying by the Washington Post newspaper.

"People have had this suspicion that we are really close. But we are showing on a very large scale that this idea goes beyond folklore."

Urban myth?

The database used by Mr Horvitz and his colleague Jure Leskovec covered all of the Microsoft Messenger instant-messaging network, or roughly half of the world's instant-messaging traffic, in June 2006.

For the purposes of the study, two people were considered to be acquaintances if they had sent one another a text message.

Examining the minimum chain lengths it would take to connect all the users in the database, they found the average length was 6.6 steps and that 78% of the pairs could be connected in seven links or fewer.

The idea of six degrees of separation was conceived by US academic Stanley Milgram, after experiments in which he asked people to pass a letter only to others they knew by name.



... or it could be a "Deliverance" moment with the rednecks ..

Mah sistah is mah aunt's uncle's brutha's father's mutha

Isn't that the queen of England's lineage? :laughing:
You are confusing rednecks with hillbillies. flowerforyou

ReddBeans's photo
Sun 08/03/08 10:31 AM
The English royal bloodline is a heck of alot more inbred than any redneck or hillbilly ever thought about being.:laughing:

Fanta46's photo
Sun 08/03/08 10:35 AM

The English royal bloodline is a heck of alot more inbred than any redneck or hillbilly ever thought about being.:laughing:


laugh laugh laugh laugh

Is that why Charles looks so funny!!!laugh laugh laugh