Topic: A closer look at actual Spinoza... | |
---|---|
what happen
|
|
|
|
interesting
|
|
|
|
what happen It was spinozified ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
reallu???
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
That was curiously entertaining...
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
wouldee
on
Sat 06/21/08 08:49 PM
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I will keep looking closer. is this a test? ![]() |
|
|
|
That was curiously entertaining... ![]() ![]() ![]() I WHOLE HEARTEDLY REJECT SPINOZA'S DISCUSSIONS HERE - AS FAR AS I CAN SEE HE HAS NO POINT, NO PHILISOPHICAL STANCE THAT CAN BE DEFENDED BY YOU OR ANYONE ELSE. IF YOUR GOING TO POST ANYMORE OF THIS/HIS RUBBISH, THEN I WILL NOT PARTAKE OF ANYMORE OF YOUR POST ON SPINOZAISM!! GROW UP CREATIVE - ARE YOU REALLY TAKEN WITH THIS EMPTY GARBAGE?? A SIX YEAR OLD COULD PUT UP A BETTER ARGUEMENT THAN WHAT YOU'VE SO SECRETLY HIDDEN HERE - EVEN ABRA COULD TEAR THIS APART LIKE TISSUE PAPER - ![]() MY ANSWER TO SPINOZA IS - SPINO!! ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I assume the axiom here is nothing comes from nothing - eh, CS...
![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
tribo
on
Sun 06/22/08 12:22 AM
|
|
I assume the axiom here is nothing comes from nothing - eh, CS... ![]() no you have it all wrong eljay, to quote spinoza as CS has stated here is: "________________________________" and i for one will not put up with such nonsense!! why that's more rediculous than religion!! ![]() |
|
|
|
I'm confused. I don't get it. I don't want it. You can keep it.
JB |
|
|
|
Finally, words from Spinoza I can agree with.
![]() |
|
|
|
Spinoza's cool. He got a lot of space in the philosophy books, and had a cool name, too. Must've been a stage name or somethin.
![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
tribo
on
Sun 06/22/08 12:14 PM
|
|
Spinoza's cool. He got a lot of space in the philosophy books, and had a cool name, too. Must've been a stage name or somethin. ![]() TRIBO: wrong!! - Spinoza was the original "spin" doctor of the ehlightenment period. His name originated from one who read his books on philisphy and responded with - " {spin!?----- No suh!} I don't agree with you". spin - no - za Before that time - he was know only as "spin" My reasearch into medievil text and books of definitions according to the famous ""universal church of brutal lies and biasis's"" - reveal's that spin is concidered to be - a once magical term much like today's purveyor's of the slight of hand use "abracadabra" to pull bunnies out of there a**, i mean hats,hats, excusem moi. Further resaerch revealed that "creative thinker's" held him in high reguard, the emphasis on "HIGH" ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|