Olermann was speaking the truth....

come on Fanta...that is exactly how Oberman wants you to see it...geeezzzz give me a break....anyone who actually watched the whole segment knew that they were talking about the aftermath of the incident and the retala tory actions taken by the Americans. I do not like O'reilly,he is too smug for my taste, but I have seen him enough to know Oberman is twisting this just way too much. Oberman has been trying to start something with o'reilly for years to get someone to watch his show...and it's still not working...LOL

correction...maybe he got one more to watch his show Fanta

Not, O'reily is an idiot. He was talking about the death of Americans. He is just too stupid to know what hes talking about!

Just like talking down to Clark, trying to over talk him, as he does everyone, and make the assumption that he knows more about military affairs than the General.

He is a pompous ass!!

He did it twice too. Which shows how moronic he is!
His personality is typical of all neo-cons. You cant tell them ****!!!

And they aint beyond lying to try and put their bull**** propoganda out...

yes he is a pompous ass...I agree but Oberman is also an insane jealous idiot who makes the whole media industry look inept!
Fanta I would research this a bit deeper by watching the whole segment then see who is making things up...watching short clips from Oberman is really not a prudent way to make such a judgement. But if you ask me ...watching either of them is a waste of time

Im so sick of 8 yrs of their ****, Im voting for Obama...

Good luck Fanta....another lost cause

I did! I posted the transcripts from Fox itself!


I'll agree though Olbermann is left, but at least he doesnt try talking over his guests to make himself seem right all the time.

I cant stand watching either, and Nancy Grace is another one!!!
GRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....

yes..you posted the transcripts of just that part of the segment Oberman was trying to twist...no one is denying that O'reilly got it backwards in that one sentence...but the whole jist of the debate was about Americans shooting the Nazi's in retribution for Malmady. Anyway....wasted enough time talking about Oberman and his rants..LOL

I've never seen her...where she at?

I also have been reading this. It is Research done on O'Reily by the Indiana University Journalist School, and published in the academic journal Journalism Studies.
It was conducted and released without any involvement of any special interest group, and the researchers received no grant funding for the study.
It is a study on Propaganda using techniques developed in 1930 by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis!

http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/5535.html

If O'Reily had apologized, and Fox news had not changed the wording in their transcripts to reflect other than what was actually said. I might be able to agree. However that isn't the case.

You really should read the research done by Indiana U before you criticize me, or stand up for O'Reily, and assume I am just ranting or jumping to conclusions!

Fanta my friend...the one word that was "changed" in the Fox transcripts was the word Malmady to normandy.....I don't think it would be a stretch to suggest and editor who never heard of Malmady...thought it was mis spelled and should have been Normandy...a very well known and famous place. But I would just be guessing my dear friend...I am not defending O'reilly, however I have seen Oberman enough to know his insane tactics

If people refuse to read the evidence concerning O'Reily. Evidence that I have posted a link to. I can post some of the findings. I would rather not, but in my own defense I can and will!

Fox never apologizes for anything they broadcast on their news channel, because THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT!

Oh wait, just like CNN O_O And MSNBC O_O

I dont buy that argument my friend. I respect your opinion, but in light of the mans reputation, I dont buy it!