Instead of attempting to claim that "Their Faith" can be made compatible with science, what they truly should be recognizing is that if there is any truth to a creator of this universe that truth must reside in all of mankind's spiritual philosophies and they need to drop this idea that any one book speaks for God, or that one individual was the actual 'son of God' sent to pay for the sins of man.




Abra, I respect your right not to believe but why should the church recognize something they dont believe? Truth about a person , event, or even GOD does not reside in everyones beliefs, people believe and write falsehoods and false perceptions all the time.

For there to be a creator, does not require recognition that anyone who chooses to write their opinions of him should have those accounts taken as truthful accounts. Certainly, if you write an auto biography about yourself or even have a relative write a biography, I should take those books as more truthful accounts than some observer or person who never knew you.

The Bible is one of many truthful accounts, in my opinion, of what happened during specific periods of time as they pertained to faith and God. There are other truthful books, but certainly not all the books written are truth just because someone wrote them.