Community > Posts By > Dramatic Muffin
Friendly
|
|
|
|
Stuck in traffic
|
|
|
|
Nope!
![]() River now? |
|
|
|
Saying hi to Storm
![]() And trying to come up with some creative ideas for a committee I'm on. |
|
|
|
Confident
![]() |
|
|
|
I discovered that whine a LOT when I'm sick.
|
|
|
|
Nope! It’s me!
![]() The fabulous Storm? |
|
|
|
I wonder what he looks like.
![]() |
|
|
|
Saying hi to Stormy.
![]() OT: I’m home sick today and feeling icky. Lying on the couch and watching FBI. |
|
|
|
Indeed! Hello, lovely ladies!
![]() Stormy? |
|
|
|
This profile seems, like, super legit.
|
|
|
|
Not this time!
![]() Birthday boy Mike? |
|
|
|
Topic:
~~~ HAPPY BIRTHDAY MIKE ~~~
|
|
Happy Birthday, Mike!
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Hi Mike!
![]() |
|
|
|
Trying to choose my word for the year.
I hope it's not cheating, but I think I'm gonna dust off an old word from a prior year--Sparkle. I actually had it engraved on a blingy ring I bought for myself to wear that year, as a constant reminder of my word. But then Covid hit, we were in lockdown and it was difficult to be sparkly that year. I think it's okay to give it a redo. ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Dramatic Muffin
on
Thu 01/05/23 11:07 PM
|
|
It's different for everyone. It's more of a personal choice. On other sites I've messaged for months. And I've met just after a couple days. Both have worked out in the past. And both have failed. I agree with NotPay4Play. It's going to be different for everyone. I think it's more about the frequency and quality of your interractions than about the length of time. Exchanging a handful of texts every day for two months is not going to form as much of a connection as video chatting on Zoom for four hours a day for a week. My partner and I met on here, and after talking obsessively to each other for a week, we knew we wanted to meet. And it would involve a significant monetary and time investment, since we live 6,000 miles apart. We had our first in-person visit 7 weeks later. If we lived in the same city we would have probably met before the first week was over. You can just tell when there is a strong connection. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Lurkers ✔️ in
|
|
Hi Mike! Happy New Year, everyone!
![]() I've been lurking for the past few days. I'm in that frame of mind where I've got nothing much to say. I hope 2023 is a fantastic year for us all! ![]() |
|
|
|
Stage 3 cancer. I'm feeling way less than groovy. Oh, Rock! I'm so so sorry to hear that. I wish you all the best. Sending you a big hug from Kazakhstan. |
|
|
|
Thinking the emergency-purchase winter boots I bought in Germany are not that aesthetically pleasing (especially for the price I paid), but man, I really like them. Super warm, and the outsoles are very grippy.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Finding Chemistry
|
|
That's connection, not chemistry. You can have a brother-sister type of relationship with someone where you have this while there is no chemistry. Chemistry is what Duttoneer implies: this strong desire to be with someone, to see someone (again), to be around them, to spend time with them. An invisible pull, like magic. Generating strong feelings in each other, feeling mesmerised by them. Usually with a sexual vibe. It can be only sexual, then there's no real connection and no desire to commit, just chemistry. In a promising relationship there is all this: admiration, chemistry, connection, commitment, compatibility. I think Crystal put it very well. This is how I view chemistry as well. |
|
|