Community > Posts By > Single_Rob
Topic:
Would tell your partner
|
|
nope, just the facts ma'am. I have a spine thank you very much, I am not a "yes dear" kind of guy
|
|
|
|
Topic:
IMPEACH, IMPEACH!!!!
|
|
Ok, you win, maybe. BUT I don't nor have I researched any of the above crimes to see if they are within the powers of the Pres. I'd hate to get into the secrets of any of our past leaders. We'd probably find worse. However, we, as American, are still here despite $3.89 a gallon for gas. |
|
|
|
Topic:
the union
|
|
how can you compare union to socialism? |
|
|
|
Topic:
IMPEACH, IMPEACH!!!!
|
|
Sorry Rob, Stupid is not an impeachable offense. We're all stupid Handing out no bod contracts (theft) Robbing the Social Security fund (theft) Sending troops into battle without proper equipment (negligence) Not securing an occuppied territory leading to death, misery, and murder (accessory to murder, assault, rape) Sugar coating reality (falsifying information) |
|
|
|
Topic:
Ahhhh....
|
|
Murphy's law strikes again
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
uhmm yes ma'am I did. I told you I would call him myself and get it straight. You replies with; "sorry, I tried" ughh, n/m, that was Sunday. I did not get the one friday, sorry, you are coorect. Kinda hard to reply to something you did not receive, lol NO excuse! |
|
|
|
Topic:
Have you ever dated
|
|
nope |
|
|
|
Topic:
the union
|
|
the union has no power or little power, we realy can only take what is given by big business, rarely do we ever stand up for principle That is a shame and a pity! I really want the union to bounce back and be strong like it once was! |
|
|
|
Topic:
IMPEACH, IMPEACH!!!!
|
|
how about for being stupid in a no stupid zone
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
[quoteoh you know you would love to know the contents. The strain is almost more than you can bear Oh yeah, Rob and I go hot and heavy. shhh, you cannot let all our secrets out |
|
|
|
Topic:
WANTED!
|
|
How about; #6 Disregard, FOUND We have heard ...CONGRATS! |
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
uhmm yes ma'am I did. I told you I would call him myself and get it straight. You replies with; "sorry, I tried" The one I sent Friday still hasnt' been read..oh, never mind. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
Edited by
Single_Rob
on
Mon 05/26/08 11:31 AM
|
|
uhmm yes ma'am I did. I told you I would call him myself and get it straight. You replies with; "sorry, I tried" ughh, n/m, that was Sunday. I did not get the one friday, sorry, you are coorect. Kinda hard to reply to something you did not receive, lol
|
|
|
|
Topic:
WANTED!
|
|
How about;
#6 Disregard, FOUND |
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
It is just a sign of who selfish our country has become. I would never NOT reply to someone who took the time to message me. It is a sign of good manners to at least let a person know you are not interested. You do not have to go into great detail, but a simple response is thoughtful, and the proper thing to do. I have written you numerous times and gotten no reply. still..I have sent you e-mails..as a friend... |
|
|
|
Topic:
Have you ever dated
|
|
nope |
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
It is just a sign of who selfish our country has become. I would never NOT reply to someone who took the time to message me. It is a sign of good manners to at least let a person know you are not interested. You do not have to go into great detail, but a simple response is thoughtful, and the proper thing to do. I have written you numerous times and gotten no reply. still..I have sent you e-mails..as a friend... |
|
|
|
Topic:
friends.........
|
|
thanks rob. good to see you man. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Courteous
|
|
It is just a sign of who selfish our country has become. I would never NOT reply to someone who took the time to message me. It is a sign of good manners to at least let a person know you are not interested. You do not have to go into great detail, but a simple response is thoughtful, and the proper thing to do. I have written you numerous times and gotten no reply. |
|
|
|
Exactly. What most people are forgetting to take into account is the teachers in question have the inalienable right to not be involved with the water balloons ina ny way. If the kids had not involved the teachers, there would have been no problem. remember people have the right to not be involved just as much as they have the right to be involved. It may seem childish and unreasonable to you that the teacher got upset about getting wet. To me it is reasonable. For example, I personally have some major problems with my back and neck, and anything sudden that makes me jump or jerk in surprise tends to hurt like hell due to it. This includes getting hit with cold water. So yes, the teachers did have the right to be upset about getting hit with the water balloons. Daniel, If I saw you walking down the street, I'd throw a water balloon at you just for the hell of it! And you would be paying my chiropactor bill when I threw my back out. If an action you take, causes someone else to come to harm, wether you intended harm or not, you are legally liable for the medical bills ensued. Just food for thought And besides, I did not mention anything of suing, did I? I assumed you would be mature enough to admit that your actions caused the result I described, and would volunteer to pay for the medical bills involved. But, you know what they say about assuming... It makes what out of both the assumer and the assumed? |
|
|