What's your take on this kind of relationship. It is very common in today's society, it's beginning to look like a full time job for some people

I know, you're one of the few religious people I can respect... I was referring to the comment you commented on

funny how religious people think they are the only ones to read a bible...one of the main reasons I'm the way that I am is because of the bible and how it makes no sense to me...

Y'all
Race is not the issue. Consider:
Mitochondrial DNA has been traced back to the 'original mother' who emanated from, guess where—Ethiopia. So we all share the same traits.
Furthermore, if one is to believe Darwin's Theory of Evolution, mankind, in general descended from the Simians.
If one believes in the Judeo Christian theology, you would be hard-pressed to prove that Christ was white-skinned.
The real issue is money and power. Disney, which owns ABC, needed to preserve its brand of family oriented, wholesome, apple pie status. It would have cost more to turn a blind eye to racist remarks with possible boycotts from advertisers and viewers going elsewhere on principle.
'Divide and conquer', familiar with that? While the populous yammers about skin color, tribalism (in the political sense, ergo, liberal versus conservative, yada yada), the rich and powerful are meanwhile:
giving you a measly $50 tax break while pocketing millions; gutting the EPA so that irresponsible corporations can pollute at will, ditto the Consumer Protection Agency; ditto Planned Parenthood and Women's Health; tearing children away from parents because, heaven forbid, less fortunate folks are trying to escape murderous regimes.
Wake up to what is really happening! Look for ways to get along, be inclusive instead of divisive. We are all brothers and sisters and at worst, cousins.

And exactly how would you know that?

The Bible is meant to be understood. But only those who have read it would know that.

My thoughts:
I don't see any reason I need to prove my beliefs to anyone?
Why would I, they're MY beliefs?

One thing that is worthy of proving is reality.
Proving reality alleviates ignorance.
Ignorance is a barrier to enlightenment and enlightenment leads to understanding. Understanding builds knowledge.

Knowledge allows us to act today to make tomorrow better.
While belief can sometimes make tomorrow seem better it only works if reality doesn't get in the way.

I can 'believe' a woman really likes me or even loves me.
I can be happy in that belief every single day until reality shows me she doesn't.
She may have no idea who I am, yet I believe she is an important part of my life.
When reality enlightens my ignorance, I am devastated.
Knowledge trumps belief everytime.
If I base my contentment and inner peace on belief, I am basing it on a delusion, not reality.

Reality is all the things that exist and the absence of things that does not exist. To 'know' something does not exist, one must know absolutely everything that does and find absence of proof in all reality.
Since nobody knows everything about everything everywhere and everywhen, God may or may not exist and that unknown is not proof either way.

Please delete my account. Ive found a girlfriend here so i dont need my account anymore. Thankyou..

And furthermore, the problem with a Christian Only forum is who gets to decide who is a Christian? Who is the arbiter of such things? The Pope? Jerry Falwell? And what do they agree on? For instance, I believe in God the Father, the Creator, the Trinity, in Jesus as God's divine son, in Jesus as the Savior, in the Resurrection and the Crucifixion, and so on, and yet there were self-righteous Christians on the DH Christian Only forum who said I was not a Christian. I just didn't believe EVERYTHING exactly as they did, so I was not a Christian, according to them. I follow Jesus only, and that's not good enough. You have to follow Paul, John, Ringo, and George, and the entire Old Testament and every blasphemy against God in it, or you're not a Christian, according to them. So no, a "Christian Only" forum is unworkable, in my opinion. Who decides who is a Christian? Aye, Matey, thar's the rub.

I am not here trying to defend Cosby. I feel he is 100% guilty. These women agreed to meet him and be alone with him. and it reports many consented to taking the drug. which led to my original post. since they met him and were alone with him, seems they might have already been willing to be intimate with him.

which leads to another question:
if they had intentions of being intimate with him, and they consented taking the drug, it must be the condition of not having control of their body that led to this case against Cosby?

because it seems, if they were willing to be alone and consenting to take the drug [you would think some knew sex might be a part of this combination]. and yes, Cosby is guilty, but i think some women were going to be intimate with him already with/without the drug.

3D block??

what is a 3D block?

not interested

no offense, but some of those women were hideous.

hard to believe you would need to drug someone that looks like a dog's rectum