The fact that World Trade Center 7 was taken down by controlled demolition has gone mainstream with over 1,200 Architects and Engineers scientifically proving the fact that the building was taken down with explosives.

http://theintelhub.com/2010/11/14/geraldo-rivera-runs-911-truth-segment-on-world-trade-center-7/

Yes..The Native Americans were driven off their lands.

The Palestinians are being driven from their lands.

The Cowboys and The Zionists have that very special relationship.

You support Israel as much as you want...but you are supporting an apartheid regime who murder Americans and other nationalities at the drop of a hat.

Not forgetting The Greatest Injustice The World has witnessed in modern times....PALESTINE

Long Live The Truth Seekers...The die-hards will stay to the death and even then they will not admit they were wrong...ego is a mind bender.

We are not going away

Slight adjustment of stats


Americans constitute less than 5% of the world's population, but consumes 26% of the world's energy.

They account for about 25% of the world's petroleum consumption, while producing only 6% of the world's annual petroleum supply.

The driving force behind America’s military agenda is very simple.

Iran’s oil and gas riches are what America is interested in and it has nothing to do with Nuclear weapons.

Israel is but a side show.

America constitutes 5% of world population and consumes 30% of the worlds energy supplies.

This hotel bar is full of people,
The piano man is really laying it down,
The old bartender is as high as a steeple,
So why tonight should I wear a frown?

The joint is jumpin' all around me,
And my mood is really not in style,
Right now the blues flock to surround me,
But I'll break out after a while.

Yes I'm a million miles away,
I'm a million miles away,
I'm sailing like a driftwood,
On a windy bay,
On a windy bay.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUv-4dNX6Jw&feature=list_other&playnext=1&list=AL94UKMTqg-9CJbD6AxXF_W0oXNX82QHzm

Much is being made of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s involvement in the on-going American presidential campaign. His public stance has been characterized as an Israeli effort to “openly … topple [President] Obama.” The truth is that the only thing unusual about this meddling is its open and advertised nature. In a more discreet fashion, Zionist pressure bordering on blackmail and bribery goes on every day.

I have written elsewhere about this corrupting process that I call “lobbification.“ In brief, this is how it operates:

Step One: A lobbyist, in this case someone from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), approaches congresspersons or senators. At some point in time that means every single one of them has been approached: all 435 voting members of Congress and every one of the 100 voting members of the Senate. Party affiliation is not an issue here.

Step Two: The lobbyist offers to organize financial campaign assistance, positive media coverage, briefings on situations in the Middle East, trips toIsrael, etc.

Step Three: All that is asked in return is that the recipient consistently vote in a pro-Israel way. In other words, AIPAC wants the politician to surrender a part of his or her mind to the lobby – the part that might exercise critical and considered judgment on issues pertaining toIsrael.

Step Four: There are several unspoken, but publicly acknowledged, consequences of turning down this offer or, alternatively, managing to get elected on your own and then voting the wrong way.

If you say no, the same offer will be made to your opponent both at the primary and general election levels.
If you are elected and vote against Israel, AIPAC will do all it can, sooner or later, to see you defeated. It has a good record of turning such people out of office.

Step Five: If you sign up for this Faustian bargain and are elected, the lobby becomes your permanent partner. It is a constant presence. Its agents are always hovering about, rating your performance, letting you know they are there. Prove yourself reliable and they will underwrite you for life.

The president and red lines

President Obama made this bargain as solidly as have most other politicians in Washington. You can witness him affirming and reaffirming this deal in front of AIPAC conventions, while addressing the United Nations General Assembly, on those rare occasions when he addresses the media, and whenever else he feels it is politically necessary. He was even willing to debase his own national party convention to make a point of his loyalty to the Israel lobby.

…Netanyahu, who appears prone to obsessive compulsive disorder … when it comes to other people’s nuclear programmes, demands that Washington set “red lines” for Tehran which, if crossed, would trigger US military action. In other words, on the basis of unsupported Zionist fears, the Israeli government is trying to manoeuvre theUnited Statesinto yet anotherMiddle Eastwar.

Yet all this has proven insufficient. The issue over which Obama has fallen short isIran.

Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu (the deus ex machina of the Israel lobby) insists that Iran is preparing to build nuclear weapons and, taking that assumption on faith, their nuclear energy programme should be stopped or placed under international control. It should be noted that, back in 2002, Netanyahu incorrectly made the same charge against Iraq and that today, just as in 2002, there is no real evidence for his assertion about Iran’s aims. All US intelligence agencies agree that the Iranians are not presently developing nuclear weapons. Nonetheless, Netanyahu, who appears prone to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) when it comes to other people’s nuclear programmes, demands thatWashington set “red lines” for Tehran which, if crossed, would trigger US military action. In other words, on the basis of unsupported Zionist fears, the Israeli government is trying to manoeuvre the United States into yet another Middle East war. To his credit, President Obama has refused to comply with the demand for “red lines”.

The standard retribution practised by the Israel lobby against a recalcitrant American politician is to try to get him or her kicked out of office. Usually this is done in a low-key way and most Americans don’t even know it is happening. But this time the act of revenge, driven by an egocentric and bellicose Israeli prime minister, is being carried out in full public view. Here are some of the ways Netanyahu is doing this:

1. Netanyahu has joined Mitt Romney in accusing Barack Obama of being too easy on Iran and too unresponsive to an ally,Israel.

2. Netanyahu has acquiesced in the use of his image and words in a blatantly false and distorted media campaign that accuses Obama of being “cozy” with the Muslim Brotherhood.

3. Netanyahu has asserted that Obama has “no moral right” to pressure Israel not to attackIran. What the prime minister leaves out is that such an attack would constitute aggression under international law and violate treaties to which both the US and Israel are signatories. Under these circumstances it would be immoral if President Obama did not pressure Israel to hold its fire.

4. When accused of interfering in the presidential elections, Netanyahu has replied: “This is not an electoral issue… I think there is a common interest of all Americans of all persuasions to stop Iran.” The bit about this not being “electoral” is clearly disingenuous. If Netanyahu wants to hold an opinion about alleged common interests that is fine. However, if as the head of a foreign government he publicly and repeatedly asserts that opinion in ways that aid one candidate for president over another, he has certainly made both himself and his opinion an “electoral issue”.

Conclusion

There is speculation that, if Mr Obama is re-elected, then Prime Minister Netanyahu’s indiscreet behaviour might result in “a sea change in US-Israeli relations”. Unfortunately, this is highly unlikely. The system of “lobbification” is solidly in place at the national political level. When it comes toIsrael, only two things are likely to change it:

1. Meaningful campaign finance reform that would free politicians from their present reliance on lobby affiliated contributions.

2. The Israel-American connection becomes a voting issue such that continued blind support forIsraelhurts a politician’s chance of election.

Neither of these possibilities seems to be on the horizon:

It is the way the USpolitical system is run that makes politicians so vulnerable to lobby power. The fact that there are some lobbies out there that have decent and humane goals is not sufficient to justify a system that otherwise does so much damage. For instance, under the present circumstances it is impossible to define the national interest in an objective way. As it stands, the national interest is replaced by the parochial interests of lobbies that are successful at suborning Congress and the White House – Zionists pushing support for a racist and expansionist foreign power, Cuban-Americans carrying on a 53-year-old vendetta against the government in Havana, the National Rifle Association striving to protect the right of every American to own a sub-machine-gun, and the like.

In large part it comes down to money and how it is used to manipulate leaders and parties. There is something age-old about this situation. It was the Roman Senator and master rhetorician Cicero (108 to 43 BCE) who said: “Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecunia possit.” That is: “No fortification is such that it cannot be subdued with money.” That is still the rule by which lobbyists live.

Some people just need to be scared even when presented with evidence to the contrary.

Anyone who now believes that Iran is a threat to world peace needs to keep their head firmly embedded in the sand.

The political and media whores are the problem.

I wouldn't kick her out of my bed.

and there's a glance in time suspended as I wonder how it is
we've been swept up just by circumstance to where the coyote lives
where my days are strips of highway
and she's wiping tables down
holding on and still waiting for that windfall


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgozu0G4OiU&feature=share

Madge ROCKS...

Iran is entitled to have nuclear weapons and would be very foolish not to equip themselves with as many as Israel have.

Big mouth Bibi would then have to respect a country of 80 million people.

The US is Already Bankrupt....

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/imeu/2012/09/18/new-revelations-on-30th-anniv-of-sabra-shatila-massacre

A Preventable Massacre


ON the night of Sept. 16, 1982, the Israeli military allowed a right-wing Lebanese militia to enter two Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut. In the ensuing three-day rampage, the militia, linked to the Maronite Christian Phalange Party, raped, killed and dismembered at least 800 civilians, while Israeli flares illuminated the camps’ narrow and darkened alleyways. Nearly all of the dead were women, children and elderly men.

Israel has been killing Palestinians for over sixty years.

34 AMERICANS were murdered on the USS Liberty.

Israel do not care who or where they murder.

Israel do not recognize International Waters.

It is honestly about time that the Dog severe the Tail that is Israel

It sure as hell wasn't a fishing boat that Scuttled the USS Liberty.

The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy torpedo boats, on June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two Marines, and one civilian), wounded 170 crew members, and severely damaged the ship.[3] At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nmi (29.3 mi; 47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish.[1][4]
Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the identity of the USS Liberty,[5] though others, including all of the ship's survivors that could be located four decades later, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.

To answer my own Question



It is less than Three Mile Fishing Limit

The Israeli navy harasses Gazan fishermen even within 3-mile limit from shore




"Take off your clothes," ordered the soldier over his megaphone. The old man and his son removed their clothing. "Get into the water," the soldier continued shouting into the megaphone. The son, 18, entered the water from the fishing skiff and swam over to the Israeli navy gunboat.

Three mile fishing Limit........True or False.

Why did you bother to answer this post if you don't give a rats arse?