Community > Posts By > mylifetoday

 
mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 04:04 PM
Certainly makes you think that is for sure.

Have to really think about how you phrase things as well!

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:38 PM
I am single because I haven't found anyone as crazy as me yet... bigsmile

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:25 PM
Had a pet catfish that was eaten by his cat. He was horrified at the cannibalism!

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:21 PM
He is AWESOME! Great Friend to have! laugh laugh laugh

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:18 PM

:banana: :banana: :banana:


flowerforyou drinker

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:15 PM
The Evil Dead! Woohoo!!! bigsmile

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:13 PM
Great Wit!

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 03:10 PM




You asked whether or not I love Muslims. Now you are criticizing that answer.


"mylifetoday" ..all I asked was do you love muslims...all you did was say Yes then proceed to critize them with nothing but negativity saying nothing positive in your rant .....

is that how you treat everyone you claim to love or just the ones you actually hate ....so let's test that theory

since you claim to also love Jesus....then (type) some criticisms about him ...


You want me to compare apples to oranges again and claim their equal.

A blanket statement about millions of people can in no way be compared to knowing one particular individual.

Find a Muslim that has done something that I would know about and I will say something positive.

The friends that I did have that were Muslim were very kind and willing to talk about anything. They were fun to be around and would joke about anything - except their faith. They didn't talk about it and would change the subject.

I cannot make that statement about All the people in a stadium let alone a whole state and you want me to make that as a blanket statement about an entire people.

I can criticize America if you like. That would be a better comparison...


Dude all I asked was for you to critize Jesus .....I know your religion forbid you to do this because it would be a sign that you didn't Love him...

but of course you had no problem critizing the muslims that you also claim to love....because to abuse others not of your faith as you bellow your love for them is an example of Christian Love

it's the same methods Christians use to deliver threats...


Ok fine Criticize Jesus.

Let me think for a minute...

ummm. Ok, got it. He didn't name everyone specifically and Identify what they needed to do to be saved in the Bible. It would be nice to see my name so I know without a doubt I am doing the right thing.

Can't really think of anything else that is worth criticizing...

So, because Jesus lead a really good life that has little room for criticism, I am not supposed to talk about anything anyone ever does except if it is good??? Got it.

So, because I am Christian, I am barred from pointing out what Muhammad did in his life because it wasn't nice.

I still don't see how you can say I am being contrary to my faith by saying I don't love the Muslim religion.

don't see how you can say I am not being true to my faith by not praising Muslims in general. I don't praise any baseball teams either. Does that mean I am violating my faith because of that???

You really pull some weird stuff together to form a conclusion. Really twisted logic. I can see how you get there. But you cherry pick the pieces you want and ignore the point that is being made.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 02:49 PM


That does not conflict in any way with my love for the people in that religion or Jesus telling us to love our enemies as well as our brothers.


is this why Jesus will have no problem killing people that he claim to love that are not of his faith in the battle at Armedgeddon ....

it make it seems that Christianity is programming it's followers to be apathetic ...you kill because you love ...




Still doing it...

Taking things out of context and making claims that were clearly not intended in anyway.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 02:34 PM


You asked whether or not I love Muslims. Now you are criticizing that answer.


"mylifetoday" ..all I asked was do you love muslims...all you did was say Yes then proceed to critize them with nothing but negativity saying nothing positive in your rant .....

is that how you treat everyone you claim to love or just the ones you actually hate ....so let's test that theory

since you claim to also love Jesus....then (type) some criticisms about him ...


You want me to compare apples to oranges again and claim their equal.

A blanket statement about millions of people can in no way be compared to knowing one particular individual.

Find a Muslim that has done something that I would know about and I will say something positive.

The friends that I did have that were Muslim were very kind and willing to talk about anything. They were fun to be around and would joke about anything - except their faith. They didn't talk about it and would change the subject.

I cannot make that statement about All the people in a stadium let alone a whole state and you want me to make that as a blanket statement about an entire people.

I can criticize America if you like. That would be a better comparison...

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 12:49 PM




absence of criticism does not equal LOVE




are you saying that even when not one positive thing is ever uttered (typed) about the person one claims to love ...that this is an example of Christian Love




lol,,,,are you saying that one and one equals three?

what makes you think I said that?

no, I said that absence of criticism is not the same as love


and I asked does nothing but criticism equate as being an example of Christian Love


Loving the people and loving the religion are two VERY different things. My factual statements regarding Muhammad's life are related to the religion only. I do not love the Muslim religion. That does not conflict in any way with my love for the people in that religion or Jesus telling us to love our enemies as well as our brothers.

There has been only a handful of times I have referred to the people in the religion and none of those times did I make any statements saying they are all to be feared or hated. Mostly, I feel sorry for them, especially the women that have to live there.

All I have really done is acknowledge what a lot of Muslim groups have said for a long time now. That they are our enemy. Remember when they declared war on the US back in the 80s??? They never called an end to that war...

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 12:35 PM






Well, ANY point you try to make that include any allegation that I hate Muslims is based on a false premise because I don't hate them.

Do you hate Christians? If you right now can answer that publicly and say yes you do hate Christians, then I will allow you to make these kinda of statements.

If you will not do that, please stop spreading false rumors about me.

I really don't like being told I hate a whole group of people based on one criteria. That is prejudice in the extreme. I have known Muslims in my life and have had Muslim friends. Please stop this. I am really tired of having to correct it.


"mylifetoday" ...perhaps you should first find any post where I stated that I hate Christians or Christianity or that there can only be peace if there were no Christians.......I make it a point to stick by "everything" I post and do not try to duck or dodge or make excuses as to find a way to weasal out of what I posted

you are the one that made a statement such as theses....if you do not like anyone accusing you of making them...then simply don't make them ...all I was saying that under "The Christian Love Law" you have the right to make such statements of hate and under Christian love Law that will be considered to be statments of Love




The statements I make regarding the Muslim religion are statements of fact. They have nothing to do with how I feel.

What does it say about you when your interpretation of the facts I present is that I must hate them? If you really stopped to think about it, that means if you would have to accept the facts as true, then you are saying that you would hate them. You are not arguing the facts, you are arguing that I don't have a right to make factual statements that would lead someone to be afraid. That is all that you are doing when you continually say that I hate them. The only way I can change that perception of yours is to deny the facts of Muhammad's life.

I find it truly bizarre. The same people that tear down Christians as a hateful group will defend Muslims as peace loving despite the blatant evidence to the contrary in the Middle East. There are always excuses given to them saying either the Jews or the Christians have provoked them. They had no choice.



again "mylifetoday'..it's about Christian Love....you are required by your religion to love muslims.... but I must say that after reading your posts it just don't seem like you do ...so I have to ask the question .....yes or no...do you Love all muslims?


Yes I do. Each person who is Muslim is worthy of being loved.

That doesnt change the facts of Muhammad's life.

What each Muslim does with their faith is their own choice, just as with Christians.

The only difference being - Muhammad's teachings were pretty much the opposite of Jesus when it came to taking up arms.


claiming to love someone and then critizing them afterwards is that an example of Christian Love or an example of abuse


Oh God Lord help me.

You asked whether or not I love Muslims. Now you are criticizing that answer.

There is nothing I can say that you will just accept. You keep asking question after question and rarely if ever answer any.

I'm tired of this. I said my piece. It is clear what I said and what it means. You love to ask loaded questions or even state it so there is no good answer.

Just answering your question is tasertly agreeing that I don't really love Muslims but only claim to.

There is no such thing as Christian abuse. So answering the question as also acknowledging that statement to be valid. There are those that abuse claiming it to be Chistian motivated. But to be a Christian means you love everyone. No abuse is possible.

I will not reply anymore unless you start making false accusations on my beliefs again.

*heavy sigh*

There is a very good likelihood you will discard everything I have said here and start using my statements of fact as proof of Christian hatred again ...

I guess as a Christian I cannot talk about any injustice because that means I don't love someone in that situation. Nice box you put us in. We must accept all abuse and can never speak out against it. If we don't we are hypocritical in your book.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 11:28 AM




Well, ANY point you try to make that include any allegation that I hate Muslims is based on a false premise because I don't hate them.

Do you hate Christians? If you right now can answer that publicly and say yes you do hate Christians, then I will allow you to make these kinda of statements.

If you will not do that, please stop spreading false rumors about me.

I really don't like being told I hate a whole group of people based on one criteria. That is prejudice in the extreme. I have known Muslims in my life and have had Muslim friends. Please stop this. I am really tired of having to correct it.


"mylifetoday" ...perhaps you should first find any post where I stated that I hate Christians or Christianity or that there can only be peace if there were no Christians.......I make it a point to stick by "everything" I post and do not try to duck or dodge or make excuses as to find a way to weasal out of what I posted

you are the one that made a statement such as theses....if you do not like anyone accusing you of making them...then simply don't make them ...all I was saying that under "The Christian Love Law" you have the right to make such statements of hate and under Christian love Law that will be considered to be statments of Love




The statements I make regarding the Muslim religion are statements of fact. They have nothing to do with how I feel.

What does it say about you when your interpretation of the facts I present is that I must hate them? If you really stopped to think about it, that means if you would have to accept the facts as true, then you are saying that you would hate them. You are not arguing the facts, you are arguing that I don't have a right to make factual statements that would lead someone to be afraid. That is all that you are doing when you continually say that I hate them. The only way I can change that perception of yours is to deny the facts of Muhammad's life.

I find it truly bizarre. The same people that tear down Christians as a hateful group will defend Muslims as peace loving despite the blatant evidence to the contrary in the Middle East. There are always excuses given to them saying either the Jews or the Christians have provoked them. They had no choice.



again "mylifetoday'..it's about Christian Love....you are required by your religion to love muslims.... but I must say that after reading your posts it just don't seem like you do ...so I have to ask the question .....yes or no...do you Love all muslims?


Yes I do. Each person who is Muslim is worthy of being loved.

That doesnt change the facts of Muhammad's life.

What each Muslim does with their faith is their own choice, just as with Christians.

The only difference being - Muhammad's teachings were pretty much the opposite of Jesus when it came to taking up arms.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 11:15 AM






Im not sure if Jesus will is comparable to human will, being that he has been WITH God since the beginning serving HIS will, unlike humans who kind of serve our own,,,by and large,,,


MsHarmony...are you saying that Jesus has no "Free Will"



I Didnt see that in my post anywhere

I said, Im not sure if jesus will is comparible to HUMAN will

I believe its synonymous with GODS will instead


MsHarmony....according to the bible...do jesus have the "Free Will" independent to that of God


in the beginning, was the word, and the word was WITH god and the word WAS god


I searched but I can't find that passage anywhere in Genesis...perhaps it's a misprint


Id go to God for that answer,


I was hopeful that perhaps you actually read the bible and had the answer



its not a question that interests me,,,


I guess whether or not Jesus having the "Free Will" to think for himself wouldn't interest you


Jesus had Free Will. He had to. Otherwise there would be no point in the Devil trying to tempt Him. And His sacrifice would be meaningless if He had no choice.

He said, no greater love has a man than he that lays down his own life for his fellow man.

If He didn't have Free Will, that statement is nonsense.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 11:02 AM


Well, ANY point you try to make that include any allegation that I hate Muslims is based on a false premise because I don't hate them.

Do you hate Christians? If you right now can answer that publicly and say yes you do hate Christians, then I will allow you to make these kinda of statements.

If you will not do that, please stop spreading false rumors about me.

I really don't like being told I hate a whole group of people based on one criteria. That is prejudice in the extreme. I have known Muslims in my life and have had Muslim friends. Please stop this. I am really tired of having to correct it.


"mylifetoday" ...perhaps you should first find any post where I stated that I hate Christians or Christianity or that there can only be peace if there were no Christians.......I make it a point to stick by "everything" I post and do not try to duck or dodge or make excuses as to find a way to weasal out of what I posted

you are the one that made a statement such as theses....if you do not like anyone accusing you of making them...then simply don't make them ...all I was saying that under "The Christian Love Law" you have the right to make such statements of hate and under Christian love Law that will be considered to be statments of Love




The statements I make regarding the Muslim religion are statements of fact. They have nothing to do with how I feel.

What does it say about you when your interpretation of the facts I present is that I must hate them? If you really stopped to think about it, that means if you would have to accept the facts as true, then you are saying that you would hate them. You are not arguing the facts, you are arguing that I don't have a right to make factual statements that would lead someone to be afraid. That is all that you are doing when you continually say that I hate them. The only way I can change that perception of yours is to deny the facts of Muhammad's life.

I find it truly bizarre. The same people that tear down Christians as a hateful group will defend Muslims as peace loving despite the blatant evidence to the contrary in the Middle East. There are always excuses given to them saying either the Jews or the Christians have provoked them. They had no choice.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 09:56 AM










Don't the priests or bishops whip themselves sometimes to repent?? I so often see this in medieval movies. Do they still do this today funches? If so there is your answer to that. They do enjoy such treatment, but they do it to repent or be cleaned off sins they have done. Kind of a punishment onto themselves believing god is punishing them for their wrong doings.


priests whipping is one example how Christians use their religion as a way to abuse themselves and claim it to be Love...that's what I meant about how Christian Love provides no distintion or guidelines as to when the Love is abuse

and because it provide no guidelines is how Christians use their religion to abuse and threaten others not of their faith and call it Love

For Example:
this debate started because "mylifetoday" posted that there would only be peace if there were no muslims ...is that comment a sign of Christians Love or is it a sign of Christian Hate flown under the flag of Love



hmmm,,philosophy is interesting,,,,

if the doctor commits malpractice,,,is that a sign of a doctors 'hypocrtic oath' or is a sign of doctors incompetence disguised as medicine?

or is it the sign of someone who has been deemed a doctor and either willfully or accidentally fallen short of their obligations?


MsHarmony...as usual your analogies generally leave key points out of the equation....

for example....the doctor saying there would be no malpractice if there were no patients just as "mylifetoday" said that they can be no peace unless there were no muslims



great,, use that example then

if the doctor says there will be no malpractice without patients, is that a comment on medicine or 'doctors' , or is it a comment on how even medicine can be misused by some doctors? or is it just an example of one DOCTOR who willfully or accidentally was mistaken in his CHOICE?



once again MsHarmony your analogies have left another key part out of the equation...for example...if the doctor mention that without patients there would be no malpractice...then why are you leaving the patients out of your equations

,,,,,things that make you go hmmmmm? (but which in no way condemn medicine or religion at large)


what should be going hummmmmm is the fact that you've already commented on "mylifetoday" posts are being Muslim Hatred ....and I was just trying to make the point that his muslim hatred is flown under the flag of being Christian Love


I don't know how many times I have to say this...

I don't hate Muslims.

I see the truth of their religion - note: NOT beliefs as everyone's personal belief is different.

The truth I see is that Muhammad told his followers to convert at the tip of a sword and he lead an army that did just that. Convert or we kill you...

That isn't hate. That is pointing out what their religion says. Just as you think you are pointing out the failures in Christianity...

Do you hate Christians???? If you can honestly say no, then you understand how I feel about Muslims...


the issue is, muslims are HUMANS first, and we can no more determine what the SPECIFIC beliefs of over a billion different individuals will be than we can any group of a billion humans,, to advocate for the disappearance of such a large number of individuals doesnt SEEM exactly like brotherly love


I don't advocate the disappearance of them.

I advocate the end of their religion. That can happen without them going anywhere.

Similar to Funches trying to dissuade all from Christianity.

If I am guilty of the things Funches says - He is guilty of the same things towards Christians.


"mylifetoday" the first rule of society is to consider that all it's citizens are insane and in need of protection from each other...in other words Christianity at this point in time is cheaper than paying for a pyschiatrist ...

the point I was trying to make is that you use your religion to spread your hatred for Muslim under the disguise of Christian Love




Well, ANY point you try to make that include any allegation that I hate Muslims is based on a false premise because I don't hate them.

Do you hate Christians? If you right now can answer that publicly and say yes you do hate Christians, then I will allow you to make these kinda of statements.

If you will not do that, please stop spreading false rumors about me.

I really don't like being told I hate a whole group of people based on one criteria. That is prejudice in the extreme. I have known Muslims in my life and have had Muslim friends. Please stop this. I am really tired of having to correct it.

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 09:46 AM


I was trying to say that Christianity in and of itself is defined by a few specific points of belief. It is not an organized religion. It is a specific set of belief everyone that calls themselves Christian holds true.

It cannot be an organized religion or there would only be on Chritian religion not the dozen that exist today.


I call BS on that. If there's a certain group of people who believe in one particular way, that is an organized religion. Whether others have there own belief systems apart from yours really doesn't matter.


Alright, to put it more specifically as you don't appear to want to understand what I'm saying: there is a definition of Christianity. Just as there is for all belief structures. People get together that have similar belief structures. Then they form a religion on that.

It is the same as defining atheism. Is that an organized religion???

mylifetoday's photo
Sat 05/28/11 09:38 AM
I was trying to say that Christianity in and of itself is defined by a few specific points of belief. It is not an organized religion. It is a specific set of belief everyone that calls themselves Christian holds true.

It cannot be an organized religion or there would only be on Chritian religion not the dozen that exist today.

I would appreciate it if someone would ask me what I mean rather than Falsely assuming what I believe to be true.

I wasn't going to post on this thread again. Hadn't even looked at it in quite some time. The only reason I said anything was because my statements on Islam were being debated with an incorrect understanding of what I meant by all parties. It was being passed around as the truth of my beliefs and was totally false.

mylifetoday's photo
Fri 05/27/11 11:28 PM

Christianity did not call for the slaughter of anyone.



You don't know your own religion's history. You are in denial. Its not just Hitler I am talking about. Its the Catholic Church (which btw,supported Hitler.)

They have killed heretics for centuries, they have killed pagans, they have killed outspoken women. There was a sect of priests (Jesuits) whose job it was to kill certain heretics who disagreed with the Catholic doctrine.

In case you don't know it, the Catholic Church is the foundation of CHRISTIANITY. It is the mother of all Christian Churches. Protestants were heretics. Many were killed.

Evil begets Evil. Your religion does not have clean hands.


Again: Christianity does not call for the killing of people that hold different beliefs. It does however call for fighting evil where you find it.

The Catholic Stance on Hitler --- Neutral:

From: http://www.religioustolerance.org/vat_hol12.htm

Involvement in the Nazi Holocaust:

The precise roles that the Roman Catholic Church played during the Nazi Holocaust is not known in depth. In particular activities by Pope Pius XII are not clear. As Eugenio Pacelli (1876 - 1958), he was the Vatican's envoy to Germany in the 1920's. As the Vatican's secretary of state, he negotiated a Concordat with Germany in the 1930s. This granted Roman Catholics freedom of worship. However, the Church agreed to become much less politically active. He became pope in 1939 at the start of World War II in Europe.

The pope's policy of neutrality may have been the least worse course. If he were to attack Hitler or his policies directly, then the Nazis might have retaliated. "...the Archbishop of Utrecht in July 1942 protested in a pastoral letter against the Jewish persecutions in Holland. Immediately the Nazis rounded up as many Jews and Catholic non-Aryans as possible and deported them to death camps..." 1

Some people have a distorted view of Pope Pius XII because of Rolf Hochhuth's 1963 play, "The Deputy" in which the Pope was portrayed as coldly indifferent to the Jews.

There are a few facts that are generally accepted:

Positive items:
bullet The phrase "righteous among nations" is a term which refers to non-Jews who helped saved Jews from the Nazis. It could be argued that Pius XII would certainly qualify for this honor, because he saved hundreds of thousands of Jews from death. One account estimates 750,000 lives saved. 2 Pinchas E. Lapide estimated 860,000. 3
bullet Pius XII did publicly condemn racist oppression -- in his wartime Christmas messages and at other times. However, the language that he used was so vague that it did not clearly refer to Nazi atrocities.
bullet Some Jewish groups, asked the Pope to remain neutral during the war so that he would be more helpful diplomatically.
bullet The church did directly condemn the Nazi policy of murdering mentally and physically disabled Germans in the 1930's. The Nazi's discontinued the program for a while.
bullet The Vatican hid 477 Jews during the war. Another 4,238 were hidden in church monasteries and convents. 4
bullet The pope spoke to a few select officials in private, encouraging them to help Jewish victims. 4
bullet In 1942, Pope Pius XII was preparing a statement condemning Nazi persecution of Jews. But he decided to not make it public because of events in the Netherlands. As noted above, Dutch bishops had protested against the exportation of Dutch Jews, with disastrous consequences.
bullet "In appreciation of what Pius did for the Jews; the World Jewish Congress made a large cash gift to the Vatican in 1945; in the same year, Rabbi Herzog of Jerusalem sent a 'special blessing' to the Pope 'for his lifesaving efforts on behalf of the Jews during the Nazi occupation of Italy'; and when Pius died in 1958, Israel's Foreign Minister Golda Meir gave a him moving eulogy at the United Nations for the same reason." 5

Negative items:
bullet Although informed of the massive Nazi attacks of synagogues and Jewish business in on Kristallnacht 1938-NOV, Pope Pius XII issued no public criticism.
bullet Although informed during 1940 to 1943 of Nazi atrocities in at least Austria, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, and the Ukraine, (including deportations to death camps) he made no public comments. 4
bullet Pope Pius XII "...never explicitly spoke out against Hitler." Actually, this is in error. He did condemn Hitler in a speech to the College of Cardinals, one month after the war ended. 2
bullet "He refused to join a resolution of the Allies condemning the Nazi crimes." 2
bullet "He never excommunicated any Nazi," 7 although he did excommunicate some German Catholics who supported cremation as an alternative to burial.
bullet "He never declared it a sin for Catholics to participate in the slaughter." 2
bullet In 1941 when asked about proposed anti-Jewish laws in Vichy France, Pius XII answered that the church condemned racism, but did not repudiate every rule against the Jews. 4

mylifetoday's photo
Fri 05/27/11 11:25 PM

Christianity did not call for the slaughter of anyone.



You don't know your own religion's history. You are in denial. Its not just Hitler I am talking about. Its the Catholic Church (which btw,supported Hitler.)

They have killed heretics for centuries, they have killed pagans, they have killed outspoken women. There was a sect of priests (Jesuits) whose job it was to kill certain heretics who disagreed with the Catholic doctrine.

In case you don't know it, the Catholic Church is the foundation of CHRISTIANITY. It is the mother of all Christian Churches. Protestants were heretics. Many were killed.

Evil begets Evil. Your religion does not have clean hands.


Again: Christianity does not call for the killing of people that hold different beliefs. It does however call for fighting evil where you find it.

The Catholic Stance on Hitler --- Neutral:

From: http://www.religioustolerance.org/vat_hol12.htm

Involvement in the Nazi Holocaust:

The precise roles that the Roman Catholic Church played during the Nazi Holocaust is not known in depth. In particular activities by Pope Pius XII are not clear. As Eugenio Pacelli (1876 - 1958), he was the Vatican's envoy to Germany in the 1920's. As the Vatican's secretary of state, he negotiated a Concordat with Germany in the 1930s. This granted Roman Catholics freedom of worship. However, the Church agreed to become much less politically active. He became pope in 1939 at the start of World War II in Europe.

The pope's policy of neutrality may have been the least worse course. If he were to attack Hitler or his policies directly, then the Nazis might have retaliated. "...the Archbishop of Utrecht in July 1942 protested in a pastoral letter against the Jewish persecutions in Holland. Immediately the Nazis rounded up as many Jews and Catholic non-Aryans as possible and deported them to death camps..." 1

Some people have a distorted view of Pope Pius XII because of Rolf Hochhuth's 1963 play, "The Deputy" in which the Pope was portrayed as coldly indifferent to the Jews.

There are a few facts that are generally accepted:

Positive items:
bullet The phrase "righteous among nations" is a term which refers to non-Jews who helped saved Jews from the Nazis. It could be argued that Pius XII would certainly qualify for this honor, because he saved hundreds of thousands of Jews from death. One account estimates 750,000 lives saved. 2 Pinchas E. Lapide estimated 860,000. 3
bullet Pius XII did publicly condemn racist oppression -- in his wartime Christmas messages and at other times. However, the language that he used was so vague that it did not clearly refer to Nazi atrocities.
bullet Some Jewish groups, asked the Pope to remain neutral during the war so that he would be more helpful diplomatically.
bullet The church did directly condemn the Nazi policy of murdering mentally and physically disabled Germans in the 1930's. The Nazi's discontinued the program for a while.
bullet The Vatican hid 477 Jews during the war. Another 4,238 were hidden in church monasteries and convents. 4
bullet The pope spoke to a few select officials in private, encouraging them to help Jewish victims. 4
bullet In 1942, Pope Pius XII was preparing a statement condemning Nazi persecution of Jews. But he decided to not make it public because of events in the Netherlands. As noted above, Dutch bishops had protested against the exportation of Dutch Jews, with disastrous consequences.
bullet "In appreciation of what Pius did for the Jews; the World Jewish Congress made a large cash gift to the Vatican in 1945; in the same year, Rabbi Herzog of Jerusalem sent a 'special blessing' to the Pope 'for his lifesaving efforts on behalf of the Jews during the Nazi occupation of Italy'; and when Pius died in 1958, Israel's Foreign Minister Golda Meir gave a him moving eulogy at the United Nations for the same reason." 5

Negative items:
bullet Although informed of the massive Nazi attacks of synagogues and Jewish business in on Kristallnacht 1938-NOV, Pope Pius XII issued no public criticism.
bullet Although informed during 1940 to 1943 of Nazi atrocities in at least Austria, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, and the Ukraine, (including deportations to death camps) he made no public comments. 4
bullet Pope Pius XII "...never explicitly spoke out against Hitler." Actually, this is in error. He did condemn Hitler in a speech to the College of Cardinals, one month after the war ended. 2
bullet "He refused to join a resolution of the Allies condemning the Nazi crimes." 2
bullet "He never excommunicated any Nazi," 7 although he did excommunicate some German Catholics who supported cremation as an alternative to burial.
bullet "He never declared it a sin for Catholics to participate in the slaughter." 2
bullet In 1941 when asked about proposed anti-Jewish laws in Vichy France, Pius XII answered that the church condemned racism, but did not repudiate every rule against the Jews. 4