Since my divorce last December, I've dated about seven different women, all different shapes and sizes. Some were knockouts, some weren't. They spanned all economic lines, ect.
You know what I noticed? Women are as bad, if not worse than men!
In what way you ask? Well, for starters their mouths! Holy Cows a Moses! Nothing says skank like continually dropping the F-bomb and the C-word.
And when did it become lady like to tell me about where you're shaved, where you like to stick it, how you like to suck this or that, ect.?
Have I missed something in five years?
This doesn't just apply to women I've dated, it seems to apply universally. I talked to this sweet girl I work with and she confirmed it... What happened to being a lady?
Or am I just completley out of touch? Maybe it has to do with the hip hop music or something
Are girls a lot different than when we was kids?

I can honestly eat pizza every day of the week...
Seriously, the most impassioned thread I've read in a while.
Building 7... a whole new can of worms, and the very foundation of the 9/11 conspiracy. I haven't done enough research on it... anyone else?

Wasn't this thread supposed to be about the idea of a 9/11 conspiracy? Fight nice boys... How about this... Isn't it great that we live in a country where we can openly "discuss" points of view with only a minimal chance that the government is listening?
Wait, some men in black suits and sunglasses are at my door. If I don't make it, tell my ex-wife I hated her!

the 3 ways to take us out
1 economy= World trade Center
2 Miltary= Pentagon
3 White house= the Plane that went down in Penn


Agree to a point...
World Trade Center- An economic dinosaur. The buildings were 30% empty. A symbolic target at best.
The Pentagon- Again, symbolic. The entire building could have been vaporized and the government wouldn't have skipped a beat.
White House- Again, symbolic... no affect whatsoever on the governemnts ability to function. Just another mess to clean up.
Al Quaida picked these targets because they were symbolic of our economic and military superiority. It was a well crafted slap in the face. They were under no impression that by hitting these targets that they were seriously injuring us economically or millitarilly. The attack was the very definition of terror.

Anyone who buys the 9/11 conspiracy bull isn't that bright or had too much time on their hands...
Let's assume, conspiracy theorists, that it was a means to justify war. Why in the world would the govt. choose the twin towers? Why not do it on a much smaller scale, with far fewer casualties? Hell, the Pentagon would have been enough to outrage people.
Now, let's again assume inside job... Think of the hundreds, if not thousands of people who would have had to be involved in the planning, ect. You mean to tell me that not one low level operative would have seen those people jumping out of those buildings and had a change of conscience? Not one big whistle blower with the facts to back it up? Get real!
Now Kennedy was a conspiracy, and I hate to say it, but he had it coming. You don't mess with the mob. They put him in office, and then RFK turns around and goes after them? JFK was a great man, but I think he thought the Kennedy's were untouchable. The mob killed Kennedy, no doubt in my mind.
9/11? A tragic day that still sends chills down my spine... but not an inside jib.

"If I were a book, I'd be an erotic thriller"

I know you were joking Jim

No inflatable required my man, doin' just fine with the real deal

I wrote about this before, and now I have further proof...
My subscription on Yahoo Personals ends tomorrow, and I'm not resubscribing. I got about three responses in January (I know ladies, hard to believe ) So I figured the hell with it.
Well, guess who had about ten profile views and a handful of "icebreakers" from gorgeous women today? You guessed it, yours truly...
My point is that I think it's a crock that these sites can get away with this crap. Sure, I dated some nice women thru Yahoo!, but trying to con me into renewing is just flat wrong. I'd rather never get laid again than go back there, just on principle.

Wow, I listed myself as heavyset...that was a mistake... I'm a trim 6'0" and 185 lbs. of pure dorky manliness!

I don't think I said anything negative about her, nor did anybody else... I think it's been all positive. I just wanted to raise the question.
I think looks are a major obstacle to online dating... you get two or three looks at somebody and a paragraph...
It's like a crapshoot.

Oh, I'm seeing her again... Just wondered how important looks were to all of you...

On New Years Eve I met and proceeded to make out with a very cool girl in a mutual state of drunkeness.
Phone #'s were exchanged, and we went out last Friday. This girl is AMAZING... we like the same music, TV shows, ect. she is arguably the coolest chick I've ever met. Hell, not only did she know who Monty Python was, she had seen "The Rutles", perhaps the most obscure of Eric Idle's movies...
Small glitch... She's not exactly attractive. She's decent looking... a few extra pounds... but otherwise a dream girl. I'm definetley seeing her again, I just hope I can see past some minor physical things I don't like. You would think at my age that these things wouldn't matter.
My experience with hot girls has been that they only stick around long enough until they meet an upgrade. Shallow, in other words, and usually boring as hell...
So, how important is physical attraction to y'all? Don't lie!

Northeastern PA big guy... but I don't think we're compatible

For the record, I never said it occured on this site.. though it may have some.

The answer of course is neither...

So it's not that I'm grossly unpopular!
The profiles are just fake!
I knew there had to be a logical explanation

It's really obvious to me now--- never said I was the sharpesr tool in the shed...
You'll see pages of average women (nothing wrong with that) and then BOOM! WOW! WHAT are you doing here!
Definetley not re-upping on Yahoo! next month...
Did Yahoo and Match really get snagged by a consuner group?

I'm not too sure it happens here, but I'm convinced that other dating sites post fake profiles from time to time...
Example...
I'm browsing through profiles on Yahoo Personals a week ago and there she is... the girl of my dreams! Beautiful, blonde, intelligent, says all the right stuff. Of course I send an e-mail, and a week later the profile is gone.
Coincidence? Nay says I. I have noticed that when the proverbial well of new profiles starts to dry up, out of the clear blue sky some super model shows up for about a week.
I personally believe that Yahoo! posts fake profiles to keep the fellas content and therefore stick around.
There is a second possibility... I a complete idiot who needs to find something else to do until Spring.

Sounds like maybe he missed a dose of meds perhaps?
Maybe the drinkin' is the thing?
Either way, I'd make other plans...